In-spansion™: The Statehood Project
Eyes on the Prize:
Thirty Senators
by James A. Bridge IIIAround the United States, on any given day, between 40 million and 70 million people languish in states where they are politically stuck. Substantial numbers of people have grown together, and apart, in a great dance of demography, and find themselves at odds with a ruling power. While this phenomenon is not an universal affliction across all 50 states, it is true in nearly one third. Fifteen states harbor significant populations at odds with each other politically in distinct geography. These are: AZ, CA, CO, WA, OR, MN, WI, IL, MI, PA, GA, NC, VA, NY, AND NJ.
The minority people in these fifteen states are entitled to a chance at political self-expression. This we find in the Constitution in Article IV Sec. 3, which outlines what we call In-spansion™, or formation of a state from within the boundaries of an existing state.
A fair question is "why now?" The now is the critical mass of organically developed distinct political regions. The Constitution is clear: if you're large enough, you can rule yourselves; now, here 's what you must do...(click here)
Fifteen of us ARE large enough now to lose a piece of ourselves to independence. There are as many as 70 million of us locked into political antipathy with a ruling political class. Our Founders left us the answer to the next question
"How?" and "what's the benefit?"
The last part first: one congressman (at least) and two senators apiece. Let that math sink in for a moment.
Now.
Isn't it worth the "how"? The "how" is convincing your state legislature to let you go, then getting Congress to approve and the President to sign.
Be part of History! Join us (click here) and the race to be the 51st state!
CHANGE AMERICA FOREVER!
The minority people in these fifteen states are entitled to a chance at political self-expression. This we find in the Constitution in Article IV Sec. 3, which outlines what we call In-spansion™, or formation of a state from within the boundaries of an existing state.
A fair question is "why now?" The now is the critical mass of organically developed distinct political regions. The Constitution is clear: if you're large enough, you can rule yourselves; now, here 's what you must do...(click here)
Fifteen of us ARE large enough now to lose a piece of ourselves to independence. There are as many as 70 million of us locked into political antipathy with a ruling political class. Our Founders left us the answer to the next question
"How?" and "what's the benefit?"
The last part first: one congressman (at least) and two senators apiece. Let that math sink in for a moment.
Now.
Isn't it worth the "how"? The "how" is convincing your state legislature to let you go, then getting Congress to approve and the President to sign.
Be part of History! Join us (click here) and the race to be the 51st state!
CHANGE AMERICA FOREVER!
Constitutional Insights
...That it will meet the full and entire approbation of every state is not perhaps to be expected; but each will doubtless consider, that had her interest been alone consulted, the consequences might have been particularly disagreeable or injurious to others; that it is liable to as few exceptions as could reasonably have been expected, we hope and believe; that it may promote the lasting welfare of that country so dear to us all, and secure her freedom and happiness, is our most ardent wish.
With great respect, We have the honor to be, Sir,
Your Excellency's most obedient and humble servants,
GEORGE WASHINGTON, President.
By unanimous Order of the Convention.
His Excellency the PRESIDENT of CONGRESS.
"Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people—a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government..." (John Jay, Federalist No. 2).
The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man; and we see them everywhere brought into different degrees of activity, according to the different circumstances of civil society. A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points, as well of speculation as of practice; an attachment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power; or to persons of other descriptions whose fortunes have been interesting to the human passions, have, in turn, divided mankind into parties, inflamed them with mutual animosity, and rendered them much more disposed to vex and oppress each other than to co-operate for their common good. So strong is this propensity of mankind to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions and excite their most violent conflicts. (James Madison, Federalist No. 10)